Other countries, other cultures, other People, may consider themselves ‘exceptional’. This may be true — to them — but American Exceptionalism is exceptionally exceptional, more exceptional than any other exceptionalism, as I’m sure you’ll all agree. As I shall endeavor to demonstrate again here.
I don’t say this only to be arch– or only to avoid doing things I must do today while I tap blindly at these keys. Those motives cannot be denied, I add in the spirit of complete transparency of the kind President Obama so forcefully advocated as a candidate. If you don’t feel like reading my bullshit but still want a good reason to be pissed off, just click this link.
Consider this: America has been exceptionally successful selling the ideas of freedom, justice and the American way. Selling is the American genius. This is beyond dispute. Nobody does it, or did it, better.
I don’t say this only out of bitterness at not being a sales genius myself, though admittedly that’s part of it. America has packaged and ingeniously sold any number of wonderful and terrible things. We are the undisputed genius of that ever-growing field which now encompasses advertising, public relations, spin-doctoring, marketing, branding, market research, demographic targeting, political persuasion, fundraising, data collection for targeted marketing, political advertising to influence the outcome of democratic processes, etc.
I think everyone can agree this amazing industry, employing many millions and influencing every American deeply (not to mention billions of others worldwide) is kind of exceptional. To have the genius and ability to sell millions of rocks as pets? Exceptional! To be able to expertly package and market candidates for political office, and launch devilishly targeted attack ads to torpedo enemy candidates? Truly exceptional! No shit, really, and no wonder these experts are paid enormous sums of money for the invaluable services they provide.
Of course, it’s mostly the bitterness speaking. And glibness, which, though I sometimes flash, I know is also a vice. So let me stop flapping me gums and post the link to the latest illustration of American Exceptionalism that has come across my desk.
Apparently, to avoid another threatened government shut-down by those elected government officials who are hell-bent on proving that government is the enemy, certain compromises were made here in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.
Sekhnet warned me to take my blood pressure meds before reading this short article on five of the most infuriating political compromises that prostitutes, pimps and panderers struck recently in our name and in the name of preserving and funding our great democracy. I made it to the end of number two, before going into the small room to do the same myself. As I went I chanted “USA! USA! USA!” If you’re feeling strong today, click here.
And God bless our exceptional United States of America.
I had something closer to my heart to write just now, but decided to write something closer to my inflamed baboon’s asshole instead:
Dear NY State of Health:
I had a message on the website congratulating me when I logged in recently. The green notice told me that there was nothing more I needed to do to keep my health insurance as it is for 2016. I then checked my Inbox for the message received on 12/20/25 and read that my subsidy was being removed. I called to straighten things out and two or three days later got an electronic disenrollment notice.
A confusing ninety minutes on the phone with NYS of Health on 12/22 resulted in erroneous information being inputted on my application on my behalf. The website crashed mid-conversation, which made things more difficult still. During the first call Marlon told me he would list my income for 2016 as zero, since my income for the last three months had been quite low. I described to him why it would be inaccurate to list my 2016 income as zero and then the call was abruptly cut off.
When I called back I learned, from the next person I spoke to, Izahn, that Marlon had filed my application listing my income as “zero”. I was unable to see my own application on-line because of the trouble with the website. Izahn assured me that he’d fixed Marlon’s mistake, submitted a new application for me and apologized for the website being down so I couldn’t see the application he’d filled out for my continued health insurance. He advised me to send the most recent tax returns. They are enclosed.
I had two emails on Christmas Day, the first referred me to a notice that turned out to be the disenrollment notice at the bottom of this letter. Marlon’s “zero” apparently triggered the other notice I was emailed on Christmas Day, informing me that the income information on the 12/23 application did not match income obtained from State and Federal sources.
I’d like to maintain my insurance coverage. Your assistance is greatly appreciated,
“Your assistance is greatly appreciated,”
He added ironically, disgustedly, clenching his face into a fist with which to smash the reader of his words to a powerless minimum wage bureaucrat working for the health insurance industry, under the guise of a program to help New Yorkers afford overpriced health insurance.
I’ve got to face the muzak, I am a member of facebook nation, whether I ever click on facebook or not.
“Social media” connects us in the most superficial possible way. Which is cool, it is the least we can do to keep up the pretense of connectedness, and for many, also the most we can do. It takes a few seconds to see the update, and if we’re not interested we click the next tab, no need to be polite or interested in the privacy of cyber friendship.
What has long irked me in real-life irks me on-line: it is rare for people to simply answer a simple question. We are distracted all the time, much more now with powerful personal computers in our shirt pockets. I don’t remember the last meal I ate in a restaurant without somebody at the table consulting a tiny, irresistible glowing screen for real-time updates.
“Oh, I’m sorry, did you say something?”
I had a friend of many years, somewhere on the Aspergers spectrum, I would think, very active on social media. We eventually had a terminal falling out, no doubt years in the making, after he promised to do a small favor in his area of expertise and then, after not doing it, was peevish about me not answering his missed call to let him explain why he didn’t do it. I wrote a series of pieces here about the unraveling situation, and in that month my “readership” spiked dramatically. In fact, it set a personal record for this largely unread blahg, a record that could stand as long as DiMaggio’s hitting streak.
The nice thing is that through writing about the situation as clearly as I could I emerged as the vicious bully and he, unrepentant but cruelly misunderstood, came out as the victim, at least in his mind. In our last call he actually attempted to bully me, which surprised me, but the point was made, if it needed making again: written words can wound. Over and over again, apparently.
After my final post on the slow-motion falling out went up I had an email from a friend. “Good thing he doesn’t have a gun,” wrote my friend about the piece. I hadn’t thought of that, but it was a good thing.
That’s the thing about being a cyber-presence, you don’t actually have to look anyone in the eye when you shoot them in the face. Look at the comments on-line sometime. I am often impressed by the level of civility and intelligence I see in comment strings on some sites. People actually support each other and try to exchange differing views in a mature and nuanced way. Then someone jumps in swinging virtual fists, light sabers, burning paper bags full of dog shit. There are some sites where fisticuffs is the norm. Put two of these bellicose trolls in a room and it’s unlikely they would be so fierce in each other’s actual presence.
Whenever I told the story of the end of the friendship with this former friend of mine I always added a line I never said, then admitted I didn’t think of it at the time. The line was “if you want to bully me, come on over, I’m home. I’ll wait for you.” This is the kind of line we would write for a laconic tough guy narrator, which I am not. But I play one on-line, you see. Not that I would have needed to be any such thing to get this particular fellow to stop talking shit.
Writing here is the easiest thing I can think of to do at the moment– it’s almost like scrolling down a friend’s facebook page. The least I can do and also, at the moment, the most. Once I send it into cyberspace I plan to get on to many things I have been thinking of doing for the last couple of weeks. In fact, let me do that now.
But first, how are you doing, my friend?
The ideologically driven filmmakers of “Let My People Go” (see previous post) certainly made their point to an eight year-old viewer, at least until the moment he was forced to make a dash to vomit. In the fifty years since that visceral moment, history, like freedom, has been on the march.
There were several wars in those years between the Jewish State and its neighbors including a decisive one, in 1967, when the virtually indefensible 1948 borders of Israel were expanded to include the buffers of the Occupied Territories of Gaza, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and Sinai. Since that time, various Israeli governments have put permanent, strategically placed settlements in some of those territories. There has been a shit-storm of controversy, with violent fanatics on both sides having way too much say over the outcome. No doubt, given the choice, most people on each side would prefer peace to endless war. The tragedy is that the voices of modest, decent people are rarely as loud and persuasive as the voices of violent haters ready to kill, everybody and anybody. Take no chances, don’t trust their words, kill them! Make them pay!
Intellectual understanding only goes so far. I can understand why powerless people living in hopeless camps for generations, subjected to curfews, checkpoints, searches, rough treatment, detention, torture, would feel desperate enough to resort to and celebrate violence. I can understand why peaceful citizens on the other side would demand curfews, checkpoints and heavy-handed tactics in order to avoid being killed by people desperate enough to blow themselves up. Like I say, understanding with the mind only goes so far. Certain things, in the word of one peace-loving Israeli I once knew, are un-understandable.
In hindsight, as they say, many things snap into the old 20/20 focus. If you think of a handful of Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto, determined to take some Nazis with them to hell as the Nazis were ‘liquidating’ the ghetto, you have a clue how this rear-view moral vision works.
There is no real choosing which was worse, the killing of millions during the Middle Passage over the course of three centuries of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, or the killing of millions during a frenzied three or four year industrialized killing machine fueled by German ingenuity and efficiency. I could not say, generations later, that either atrocity gives anyone a right to kill anyone else over it.
I’ve got no answer, propose no equivalencies, no justifications, nada. It’s a horrible situation over there in Palestine/Israel, Israel/Palestine, as in many parts of the world, many of them in the immediate neighborhood. Violence and brutality are always passionately justified by the practitioners. History shows that the violent and brutal often carry the day while voices of reason usually get their brains blown out if they speak clearly enough and get enough attention. I’d like to believe that in the long run human decency and our eternal longing for peace win out, but, looking around, I realize I may be with Anne Frank there, and Jesus, and right before he got shot, the Gandhi I was cursing just the other day.
Southeastern states had the highest number of preventable deaths for each of the five causes. The study authors suggest that states with higher rates can look to states with similar populations, but better outcomes, to see what they are doing differently to address leading causes of death. source
From a short book he wrote toward the end of his life, a series of mini interviews with famous and infamous people from the world beyond. Afterlife Correspondent Vonnegut would enter the Pearly Gates for each interview, pursuant to the deal the atheist made with St. Peter to be allowed into heaven to conduct these short chats with historical figures for the benefit of those of us walking on the earth at that particular moment in time. The proceeds from the sales of the book were donated to National Public Radio, or possibly to WNYC.
In his short intro Vonnegut describes the loneliness of modern life, a theme he often revisited. He contrasted life in modern industrialized society to the vastly more social lives lived for millennia by groups of humans. An Ibo baby in Africa is taken to meet her 400 aunts, uncles and cousins who take her in their arms by turn and coo at her and tell her how beautiful she is. Wouldn’t you love to be that baby? asks Vonnegut.
The truly genius take is this, and I don’t have the text ( less than two sparsely type-set pages in total) in front of me so you’ll pardon (or not) a paraphrase.
Freud didn’t know what women want, wrote Vonnegut, but Vonnegut does. Women want to talk, to everyone, about everything. What do men want? Some pals and nobody to be mad at them. The modern arrangement, a man and a woman pair off and live together, become the largest part of each other’s social universe.
The woman gets somebody to talk to about everything all the time: but it’s a man.
The man gets a pal and somebody not to be mad at him: but it’s a woman.
Because a great Vonnegut insight should end with a profound, yet comic bow he adds:
Each one, unwittingly, has the same anguished complaint against the other: “you are not enough people!”.
As pithy a nutshell of something fundamental as any you’ll hear today, it seems to me.